Legal Opinion

Riddick v. . Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Upon the facts shown in the record on this appeal, these questions arise for decision:(1) Are the makers of the deed of trust necessary parties to the action instituted under the provisions of C. S., 994, by the purchaser at the foreclosure sale for the purpose of obtaining authority for the infant trustee to execute a deed pursuant thereto ?(2) If so, may the makers of such deed of trust, not having been parties to such action, exercise equity of redemption against such purchaser to whom deed has been made by the infant trustee upon order of court ?

The language of the statute and the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Stevens v. . TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Crews v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. State Ex Rel. Committee on Grievances of the North Carolina State Bar Ass'n v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. FurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Shores v. RabonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Cleve v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API