Legal Opinion
Fickeisen v. Peebler
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1950No. Civ. 17174PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
H. C. Fickeisen, as trustee in bankruptcy of Graceland, a corporation, by his amended complaint sought to quiet his title as trustee and that of the corporation to 5 acres of land in the county of Los Angeles which, with other land, is devoted to cemetery use. Defendants, Byron Feebler, Ethel M. Feebler, James Danziger, Edith W. Danziger, George W. Archer and A. F. Hutchinson, filed their answers denying plaintiff’s allegation of title and asserting their own title to, or interests in, the land. The cemetery project was undertaken some time prior to 1923 and certain of the parties who were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bradley v. ButchartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- G. R. Holcomb Estate Co. v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Earl v. LofquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Danziger v. PeeblerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Emblen v. Southern Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Grossmont Healthcare Dist. v. SDHACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000