Legal Opinion
Anchorage v. Sandberg
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1993No. S-4777PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this inverse condemnation action, the Municipality of Anchorage (municipality) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Sandberg, Davis and Richards (SD & R). The municipality argues that the court erred in finding that its activities resulted in a taking of SD & R’s property pursuant to art. I, § 18 of the Alaska Constitution. We reverse the court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of SD & R and remand the case for entry of summary judgment in favor of the municipality.
II.FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The facts in this ease are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Hageland Aviation Services, Inc. v. HarmsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Lakeview Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Beluga Mining Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.