Beluga Mining Co. v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Beluga Mining Company held mining claims located on lands held in trust by the State for the benefit of the Alaska Mental Health Lands Trust. A preliminary injunction entered in litigation over the State’s handling of the Mental Health Trust lands prevented the State from issuing mining leases on trust lands. Unable to mine its claims, Beluga abandoned them and sued the State for resulting economic losses. The superior court dismissed the suit. Because we conclude that there was no taking, contract, or unjust enrichment, we affirm.
II. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Bennett v. Kentucky Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Liimatta v. VestAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Simpson v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.