Legal Opinion

Beluga Mining Co. v. State, Department of Natural Resources

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1999No. S-8256PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Beluga Mining Company held mining claims located on lands held in trust by the State for the benefit of the Alaska Mental Health Lands Trust. A preliminary injunction entered in litigation over the State’s handling of the Mental Health Trust lands prevented the State from issuing mining leases on trust lands. Unable to mine its claims, Beluga abandoned them and sued the State for resulting economic losses. The superior court dismissed the suit. Because we conclude that there was no taking, contract, or unjust enrichment, we affirm.

II. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bennett v. Kentucky Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Liimatta v. VestAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Simpson v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API