Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 23, 2006No. CRIM. 05-0066 PLFPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion under Rules 12(b)(4)(B) and 16(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to compel the government to provide a notice of intent to use specified evidence in its case-in-chief at trial. Argument was heard on the motion on February 21, 2006. Upon consideration of the arguments of the parties as expressed in their briefs and in open court, the Court grants defendant’s motion in part.

Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure authorizes a criminal defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. de la Cruz PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  3. United States v. PoindexterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
  4. United States v. BrockDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
  5. United States v. KelleyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  2. United States v. LujanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  3. United States v. SalyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. United States v. CrowderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. IshakDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API