Legal Opinion
United States v. Ferguson
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 24, 2007No. Criminal 3:06CR137 (CFD)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS RELATING TO THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT AND DISCOVERY
DRONEY, District Judge.
On September 20, 2006, a federal grand jury in the District of Connecticut returned a sixteen count Superseding Indictment charging the defendants, Ronald E. Ferguson, Christopher P. Garand, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, and Elizabeth A. Monrad, with conspiracy, securities fraud, mail fraud, and making false statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Since their indictment, the defendants filed ten motions on matters relating to the indictment and discovery. Defendant…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. SkillingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Kirk Tang YukCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- United States v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.