Legal Opinion
Universal Security Instruments, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1981No. 80-1494PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, District Judge:
Universal Security Instruments, Inc. has petitioned this court to review a finding by the National Labor Relations Board of several violations of § 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. The Board, through its General Counsel, has cross-petitioned for enforcement of its order and the union has intervened on behalf of the Board.
I. FACTUAL SETTING
The facts of this case were laid out in the Decision and Order of the Board and in the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision. See 250 NLRB No. 92 (1980). While we feel no…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State System of Higher Education v. Association of Pennsylvania State College & University FacultiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Sara Lee Bakery Group, Incorporated, Formerly Known as the Earthgrains Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Sara Lee Bakery Group, Incorporated, Formerly Known as the Earthgrains CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Universal Security Instruments, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981