Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2002No. 01-2067, 01-2228Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLuttig, Circuit Judge

The majority concludes that the Board failed to properly apply its precedents re*302garding whether -a company’s- employees at a “new facility” must be regarded as a separate bargaining unit, and, “for this reason alone,” it denies enforcement to the Board’s -finding that Earthgrains committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to recognize the union at the consolidated facilities in Meridian, Laurel, and Hatties-burg. See ante at 298. I believe that this conclusion is based on a misreading of the Board’s previous decisions and a misunderstanding of this court’s authority- to review decisions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Coronet Foods, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Coronet Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. National Labor Relations Board,petitioner v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Fayetteville, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. Staten Island University Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. The Baltimore Sun Company v. National Labor Relations Board,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API