Harris v. Draper
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe question for decision is whether tbe trial and judgment can be sustained in tbe face of tbe exceptions shown in the record and debated on brief. We are constrained to answer in tbe negative.
First. Exception to Exclusion of Evidence: Tte witness, Ervin Green, if allowed to testify, would bave said the defendant’s car was traveling about 60 miles an bour when it struck the car be was driving. This proffered testimony was competent, its weight and credibility, of course, being for the jury. Hicks v. Love, 201 N.C. 773, 161 S.E. 394; Jones v. Bagwell, 207 N.C. 378, 177 S.E. 170; Tyndall v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tyndall Ex Rel. Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hicks v. . Love and Bruton v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Jones v. BagwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Jones v. . BagwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Davis v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Green v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Litaker v. Bost Ex Rel. BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.