Green v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The demurrer admits the factual allegations of the complaint. Bennett v. Surety Corp., 261 N.C. 345, 134 S.E. 2d 678; Stegall v. Oil Co., 260 N.C. 459, 133 S.E. 2d 138.
The complaint alleges these facts: Vehicular travel on South Hamilton Street in High Point is restricted to vehicles moving, or to move, in a northward direction. The vehicular portion of the street is divided into five lanes. The easternmost and westernmost lanes are for use in parking. The three innermost lanes are for moving traffic. An ordinance of High Point requires vehicles parking in the eastern lane to park with their…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tart v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Jackson v. NEILL McKAY GIN COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- McEwen Funeral Service, Inc. v. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Warren v. ColomboCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Young v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.