Legal Opinion
State v. Bernstein
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 14, 2014No. 1 CA-SA 13-0285PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge.
¶ 1 Real parties in interest are defendants facing aggravated driving under the influence (DUI) charges for violating Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 28-1383 (2014)1 in Maricopa County Superior Court. On the dates of the alleged offenses, law enforcement officers drew two vials of blood from *92each Defendant. The Scottsdale Crime Laboratory (SCL) then tested blood from one of those vials with the following results:
[[Image here]]
For each Defendant, these blood alcohol content (BAC) test results far exceed the 0.08 threshold for DUI and, except for Defendant Rotmil,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Hon. bernstein/hermanArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Glazer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. SteinleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015