Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Hon. bernstein/herman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2015No. CV-14-0057-PRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice BALES,

Opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Evidence 702 requires a trial court to act as a gatekeeper to ensure that only reliable expert witness testimony is admitted for the jury’s consideration. This ease concerns the trial court’s role under Rule 702(d) when a party contends that an expert has not properly applied generally reliable principles or methods. We hold that courts, as gatekeepers, should consider whether a methodology has been correctly applied. But we conclude that errors in application should result in the exclusion of evidence only if they render the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. Adrian Paul MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. Don Jacob HavatoneArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State of Arizona v. Joseph Javier RomeroArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State of Arizona v. Christian AdairArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. Steinle ex rel. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API