Legal Opinion
Strotz v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 27, 1990No. E006574PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
Defendants Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (Dean Witter) and Craig Nelson (Nelson) appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration. The trial court denied arbitration because of plaintiff’s allegations in her complaint that defendants had fraudulently induced her to sign the contract which contained the agreement to arbitrate and that the fraud permeated the entire contract, including the agreement to arbitrate.
I
FACTS
In October of 1985, plaintiff went to the Dean Witter office in Upland and met with Nelson for the purpose of transferring her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Szetela v. Discover BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bolter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.