Legal Opinion
Bolter v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 2001No. G027378PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’LEARY, J.
Franchise owners, Florence Bolter (doing business as Bolt-er’s Chem-Dry), Sandra Valdez (doing business as Canyon Chem-Dry), and Stephen R. Knight (doing business as Knight’s Chem-Dry) filed the underlying writ petition challenging the court’s ruling their breach of contract action against Harris Research, Inc., must be arbitrated in Utah. The franchisees acknowledge their franchise agreements mandate that all disputes be arbitrated in Utah, but claim the provision is unconscionable and violates Business and Professions Code section 20040.5. Finding their first contention…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kinney v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- David Tompkins v. 23andme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Covenant Health & Rehabilitation of Picayune, LP v. Estate of Moulds Ex Rel. BraddockMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Harper v. UltimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Woodside Homes of California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.