Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
The primary issue in this case is whether a claim under the Miller Act, 40 U. S. C. §§ 270a-270d, as amended, based upon arbitration clauses in two subcontracts providing for arbitration of any dispüte arising thereunder, is enforceable under the provisions of the United States Arbitration Act. 9 U. S. C. §§ 1, 2 and 3. The institution of this suit was directed toward the recovery of compensation alleged to be due under two subcontracts between the petitioner, a plumbing and heating contractor, and the respondent Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc., who was the prime contractor under a…
2Cited by100 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Haynsworth v. the CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.