Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 17, 1963No. 401PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The primary issue in this case is whether a claim under the Miller Act, 40 U. S. C. §§ 270a-270d, as amended, based upon arbitration clauses in two subcontracts providing for arbitration of any dispüte arising thereunder, is enforceable under the provisions of the United States Arbitration Act. 9 U. S. C. §§ 1, 2 and 3. The institution of this suit was directed toward the recovery of compensation alleged to be due under two subcontracts between the petitioner, a plumbing and heating contractor, and the respondent Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc., who was the prime contractor under a…

2Cited by100 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Haynsworth v. the CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API