Legal Opinion
Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 2, 1942No. 170PublishedCited by 254 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The libel alleged that appellant (respondent) had, through its authorized repre sentatives, agreed to a charter party with appellee (libellant). Appellant’s answer in effect denied that anyone authorized to act for it had so agreed. After a trial, the district court made the following
“Findings of Fact
“1. Libellant, Kulukundis Shipping Co. S/A, employed Blidberg Rothchild Co. Inc. as a broker and the respondent, Amtorg Trading Corporation employed Potter & Gordon, Inc. as its broker in the negotiations for the chartering of the ship ‘Mount Helmos’ for a trip to Japan. On…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. v. Westchester Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by254 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Drake Bakeries Inc. v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Will-Drill Resources, Inc. v. Samson Resources Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.