Framlau Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
This case, arising under the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321, 322 (1970), is before the court on plaintiffs appeal from a decision entered by Trial Judge Francis C. Browne, allowing defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff does not request review of seven counts of its petition disposed of by the trial judge. What remains for our attention are counts III, VIII, X, and XI of plaintiffs petition and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as it relates to those counts.1 We reach the same result as the trial judge but by a somewhat different and shorter route.
Numerous issues were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to the Use and Benefit of Head Construction Company v. Mergentime Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.