Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Maracic

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 31, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Maracic and Hibbits were indicted for trafficking in 200 or more grams of cocaine in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32E(¿)(3), as appearing in St. 1982, c. 650, § 11. The defendants moved to dismiss the indictments, arguing that the 1982 amendments to this statute were unconstitutionally vague because the Legislature had failed to clarify unclear language in the penalty section of the statute as inserted by St. 1980, c. 436, § 4. The Supreme Judicial Court struck down similar provisions as impermissibly vague in Commonwealth v. Gagnon, 387 Mass. 567 (1982), Commonwealth v. Marrone, 387 Mass.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. BongarzoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. LightfootMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MarroneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. SabettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. JiminezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Cedeno v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API