Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jiminez

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 30, 1986PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The defendants, Reynaldo Alcedo Jiminez and Jorge Mayans, were indicted for (1) unlawfully carrying a firearm (a nine millimeter “Mac 10” weapon), (2) unlawful possession of an altered firearm (a sawed-off shotgun), and (3) unlawful possession of cocaine, with intent to distribute, said cocaine being in excess of 200 grams. Both defendants were convicted on all three indictments following a jury trial. On appeal, they allege several errors which they claim require reversal of their convictions.

1. Denial of suppression motions. Prior to trial, both defendants filed motions to suppress certain…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. MeehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. United States v. Rickus, Robert F. United States of America v. Nazarok, Dennis M. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. MosesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. WunderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API