Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The defendant, Victoria Rodriguez, was convicted of trafficking in cocaine. The defendant appeals, arguing that the motion judge erred in denying her motion to suppress and that the trial judge erred in his instructions to the jury. We transferred this case here on our own motion. We affirm.
1. The motion to suppress. The defendant moved to suppress “as the fruits of an unlawful search and seizure all objects seized and information obtained in the execution of a Springfield District Court search warrant.” She argued that neither the facts set out in the search warrant nor the circumstances…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CundriffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. ScaliseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- United States v. Juan Octavio Pena GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. Pares-RamirezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Swaby v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- State v. SartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.