Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gagnon

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 4, 1982PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The single issue in this case is the constitutionality of G. L. c. 94C, § 32 (a). We hold that it is unconstitutional.

In February and March, 1981, an Essex County grand jury returned two indictments against Norman Gagnon and one against Philip C. Chouinard for the unlawful distribution of heroin in violation of § 32 (a) of G. L. c. 94C, the Controlled Substances Act. In May, 1981, the defendants moved to dismiss the indictments on the ground that § 32 (a) “is unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous in that its penalty clause comprehends two inconsistent penalty schemes and is therefore void.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Commonwealth v. ChretienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BongarzoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. ChavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. State v. NailSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. Colon-CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API