Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lightfoot

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 23, 1984PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

A grand jury indicted the defendant, Gregory Lightfoot, for deriving support and maintenance from and sharing in the earnings and proceeds of a female prostitute, in violation of G. L. c. 272, § 7, as amended through St. 1980, c. 409. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment in which he asserted that G. L. c. 272, § 7, 1 is “impermissibly ambiguous and unconstitutionally vague.” The trial judge hearing the motion ruled that the question of law raised by the defendant is so “important” as to “require the decision of the Appeals Court” and he reported it. 2 See Mass. R. Crim. P.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Registrar of Motor Vehicles v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Massachusetts Hospital Ass'n v. Department of Medical SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Pielech v. Massasoit Greyhound, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Simon v. State Examiners of ElectriciansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. NolanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API