State v. Buttrey
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*577PETERSON, J.
In State v. Stroup, 290 Or 185, 620 P2d 1359 (1980), we held that in a prosecution for driving while suspended, ORS 487.560, where the suspension is for failure to appear in court, the state is not required to prove, as an element of the offense, that the order of suspension was mailed to defendant. We also held that procedural due process did not require, as an element of the offense, proof of mailing of the notice of suspension, because the defendant, before the suspension, was provided an opportunity for a hearing and given notice that failure to appear at the hearing might…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. OwenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.