Legal Opinion

People v. Betts

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1987PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*291OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

The conviction for rape in the first degree, as affirmed by the Appellate Division, must be reversed and a new trial ordered because the trial court erred in its pretrial ruling that, if the defendant chose to testify in his own behalf at trial, he would be deemed to have waived his privilege against self-incrimination and be exposed to cross-examination, for credibility purposes, with respect to a pending unrelated criminal charge.

The applicable evidentiary rule is that a defendant is entitled to a pretrial ruling, based on the assertion of the privilege…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. People v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. People v. ScarolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. RojasNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. CantaveNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API