Legal Opinion

People v. Hopkins

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1983PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The finding that the defendant’s prearraignment oral and written confessions were voluntary, having support in the record, is beyond our review (People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38-39; People v Leonti, 18 NY2d 384, 389, cert den 389 US 1007). Moreover, absent extraordinary circumstances, a delay in arraignment is but a factor to consider on an issue of underlying involuntariness (People v Holland, 48 NY2d 861; People v Dairsaw, 46 NY2d 739). And such a delay does not cause the right to counsel to attach…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. People v. RoopchandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. PerezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API