Legal Opinion

People v. Huntley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1965PublishedCited by 718 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

This is one of the cases in which we are under compulsion to work out—without benefit of controlling decision, statute or rule — an appropriate procedure for providing the separate hearing mandated by Jackson v. Denno (378 U. S. 368 [1964]) as to voluntariness of a confession received in evidence against a defendant at his trial. For the present and tentatively we set out some of the rules to be applied in these matters, pending further development by the courts or by the Legislature, or both.

*75In 1960 appellant Huntley was, after trial in the former Court of General…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Matter of Morhous v. N.Y. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. People Ex Rel. Carr v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by718 opinions

  1. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

713 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API