Legal Opinion

People v. Scarola

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1988PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

The principal issue presented in these unrelated appeals is whether the trial courts erred in refusing to allow defendants to demonstrate their voices to the jury. Inasmuch as the voice exemplars were offered as real or demonstrative evidence, defendants did not have an absolute legal right to admission of the evidence and under the circumstances presented we hold that neither court abused its discretion in refusing to admit it. Accordingly, the orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

I

Defendant Michael Scarola was indicted for the crimes of robbery…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. People v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. PrimoNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. The People v. Christopher A. NicholsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API