People v. Rojas
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
Defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing the prosecution to introduce evidence of a prior alleged crime. He relies on People v Molineux (168 NY 264 [1901]), which prohibits the introduction of such evidence unless it falls within a limited number of exceptions to its rule. We conclude, however, that because defendant opened the door to this proof based on the combination of his opening statement and cross-examination of a prosecution witness, the court properly admitted the challenged proof.
While in custody in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. DormNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CassNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. MassieNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. ResekNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.