Legal Opinion

Larkin v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1932No. 23194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The following facts are established by the record:

Hannah H. Larkin is the owner of certain trucks and other equipment, engaged in business in the city of Dayton as a transportation and storage company, doing business under the firm name of Larkin Transfer & Storage Company. Her son, Daniel C. Larkin, is engaged in business in the city of Dayton as Larkin Motor Freight Terminal. Daniel C. Larkin owns the freight terminal, but possesses no equipment. The record shows that neither of these businesses is incorporated, being owned respectively by Hannah H. Larkin and Daniel C. Larkin. For…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hissem v. GuranOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. C. Sheets & Sons v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Highway Freight Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Commercial Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API