Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

This is the second appearance of plaintiff in error in this court. In the former case, Motor Freight, Inc., v. Public Utilities Commission, 120 Ohio St., 1, 165 N. E., 355, the majority of the court were of the opinion that the evidence therein adduced did not bring the respondent, Motor Freight, Inc., within the meaning of the term “motor transportation company,” as it was then defined in Section 614-84, General Code. While the character of the plaintiff in error’s business is, in the main, set forth in that case, there are now presented some additional facts which more clearly disclose its…