Commercial Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The assignments of error will be summarized and decided under the following questions :
1. Did applicants establish actual necessity and public convenience?
The record is replete with testimony proving both. The doctrine of estoppel pronounced in Liberty Highway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 128 Ohio St., 586, 193 N. E., 407, applies to appellant.
2. Were only private interests involved, since the Frigidaire plant is the sole shipper concerned?
It is claimed that the commission failed to follow the principles announced in McLain v. Public Utilities Commission, 110 Ohio St., 1,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Breuer v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Continental Freight Forwarding Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Gilbert v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allman Transfer & Moving Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944