Legal Opinion

Harshaw v. . Harshaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevih, J.

Tbe appeal presents tbe single question whether tbe plaintiff may be permitted to maintain ber action for libel when tbe defamatory matter complained of was contained in pleadings filed in proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction. Tbe defense is tbat pertinent statements contained in pleadings in court are absolutely privileged, and no action thereon can arise.

Undoubtedly, tbe general rule is tbat pleadings are privileged when pertinent and relevant to tbe subject under judicial inquiry, however false and malicious tbe defamatory statements may be. Baggett v. Grady, 154 N. C., 342, 70…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  3. Hedgepeth Ex Rel. Hedgepeth v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Nissen v. . CramerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API