Legal Opinion

State v. Luzietti

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 2, 1994No. 14828PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to grant the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal six weeks after the defendant had begun serving his sentence. We conclude that the trial court had no such jurisdiction and that it, therefore, improperly granted the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court, which reversed the trial court’s judgment of acquittal and remanded the case with direction to reinstate the judgment of conviction.

The relevant procedural facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. CatorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. State v. McCahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API