Legal Opinion
State v. McKinley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 5, 1975No. 45537PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the St. Paul municipal court dismissing a charge against defendant for operating an automobile after cancellation of his driving privileges. The basis of the dismissal was that the court lacked jurisdiction because the seizure of defendant was in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and of Article 1, § 10, of the Minnesota Constitution. The city of St. Paul appeals in the name of the state. We affirm.
On April 7, 1974, about 6 p. m., during daylight hours, defendant, L. B. McKinley, was operating an automobile in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.