Legal Opinion
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Sloan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 3, 2007No. A06-531Published
1Opinion of the Court
729 N.W.2d 626 (2007)
In the Matter of the CLAIM FOR BENEFITS BY Alexander Benjamin SLOAN.
No. A06-531.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 3, 2007.
Eric R. Lee, Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A., Coon Rapids, MN, for relator.
Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Bernard E. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, Presiding Judge; HUDSON, Judge; and DIETZEN, Judge.
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Pursuant to a timely filed petition for writ of certiorari, relator Alexander Sloan challenges the Public Safety Officers Benefits Eligibility Panel's denial of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.