Legal Opinion

Folmar v. Elliot Coal Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1971No. Appeals, Nos. 210 and 211PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Pomeroy,

These are suits in trespass to recover damages for injury to plaintiffs’ property allegedly caused by air pollution attributable to defendant’s operation of its coal-cleaning plant.1 The trial court by its verdict found for the defendant in both cases and, as provided by Pa. R. C. P. Rule 1048, supported its verdict with findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiffs’ ex*594ceptions to the findings and conclusions were overruled, and these appeals followed.2

The findings of fact, broadly stated, were as follows: The two appellants purchased their homes in 1931…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Glen Alden Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Waschak v. MoffatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Burr v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Herring v. H. W. Walker Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harris v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. O'LEARY v. Moyer's Landfill, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Dexter v. BebenekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Ackerman v. Heinsohn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API