Legal Opinion

Harris v. Pernsley

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 22, 1985No. 84-1039PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs, inmates of Philadelphia’s Holmesburg Prison, appeal from a judgment dismissing their amended class action complaint, which seeks injunctive relief against that institution as well as money damages for the conditions of confinement in same. The plaintiffs originally filed a pro se complaint which was later amended after the appointment of counsel. The trial court dismissed at the pleading stage because of the possibility of relief under the terms of a judgment rendered in a case pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Burns v. PA Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API