Legal Opinion

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 7, 2007No. 05-4286UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

The City of Pittsburgh appeals the District Court’s order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Norfolk Southern Corporation. We will affirm.

I

The facts and procedural history of this case are well-known to the parties and are thoroughly set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (R&R). Hence, we briefly summarize the factual background of the case and limit our discussion to our ratio decidendi.

A portion of the hillside under Corfu Street in Pittsburgh (“the City”) rests upon a partially eroded, prehistoric landslide. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frank E. Acierno v. New Castle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. McArthur v. BALASSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Glasco v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Folmar v. Elliot Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Golen v. Union Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R&R Family Invests. v. Plastic Moldings Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API