Legal Opinion

Waschak v. Moffat

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1954No. Appeal, 277PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

*443The appeal is from a judgment of the Superior Court refusing to enter judgment non obstante veredicto for defendants in an action in trespass and affirming the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County in favor of plaintiffs.

Gas or fumes from culm banks, the refuse of a coal breaker, damaged the paint on plaintiffs’ dwelling. In this action for damages the applicable legal principles are technical and controversial. Considerable confusion appears in the many cases. The field is that of liability without fault for escape of substances…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Federoff Et Ux. v. Harrison Const. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Summit Hotel Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Kramer v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Hannum v. GruberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Youst v. Keck's Food Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Hennigan v. Atlantic Refining CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Hendricks v. StalnakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Liberty Place Retail Associates, L.P. v. Israelite School of Universal Practical KnowledgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API