Burr v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Chidsey,
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action in trespass against the defendant, a road construction company, to recover damages arising out of the subterranean contamination of their water supply. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $16,-000. The defendant filed motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for new trial which were dismissed and judgment entered on the verdict. The defendant appeals therefrom.
In passing on defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. we must review the evidence and consider all the facts and reasonable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Waschak v. MoffatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pfeiffer v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Nixon v. ChiarilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Weiley v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Youst v. Keck's Food Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.