Mieras v. Dyncorp
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, Judge.
1. This workers’ compensation case involves an appeal and a cross-appeal. Dyncorp and its insurance carrier, National Union Fire Insurance Company (Appellants), argue that: (1) the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) erred in allowing an out-of-state health care provider, who had never treated the deceased Worker (the decedent), to testify in the workers’ compensation hearing on the substantive issue concerning causation between the events leading to the decedent’s death and the work performed; and (2) the WCJ’s finding that the decedent suffered a fatal myocardial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Wagner v. AGW CONSULTANTSNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Buckley Powder Co. v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. EstradaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.