Legal Opinion
State v. Estrada
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 2001No. 20,829PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Defendant, Joseph Estrada, was convicted of retaliating against a witness, contrary to NMSA 1978, § 30-24-3(B) (1997). On appeal, he asserts that (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for discovery on the issue of selective prosecution, (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on grounds of demagogic prosecution, (3) prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument constituted reversible error, (4) the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of his prior convictions, and (5) the evidence was insufficient…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. WildgrubeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. FrancoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. McGeeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Matter of ConvisserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.