Legal Opinion
Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal Schools
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2005No. 27,950PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAES, Justice.
{1} Christy Ann Breen and Dahlia Carrasco (“Petitioners”) suffered temporary total primary mental impairments compensable under the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”). They appeal a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (“WCJ”) order limiting ■ their compensation to 100 weeks pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 52-l-41(B) (1999), even though he found they have been disabled in excess of 240 weeks. Petitioners argue that Section 52-1-41 and NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-42 (1990), of the Act violate the Equal Protection Clause of both the New Mexico and United States…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Griego v. OliverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- New Mexicans for Free Enterprise v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corp. v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.