Case v. Murdock

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Gary Case claimed Murdocks and McCroden intentionally interfered with his employment contract and his contract to purchase stock. The trial court granted summary judgment to Murdocks and McCroden, and Gary appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] The facts surrounding this appeal are fully stated in our opinions in Case v. Mur-dock, 488 N.W.2d 885 (S.D.1992) and Case v. Murdock, 528 N.W.2d 386 (S.D.1995). However, for purposes of this appeal, a brief review of the pertinent facts is necessary.

[¶ 3.] Hickok’s, a closely held gaming corporation located in Deadwood, South…