Legal Opinion

McCroden v. Case

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1999No. 20848PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, J.

[¶ 1.] Defendant Maxine Case (Case) made a motion to determine the status of a corporate stock purchase by her in light of our decision in Case v. Murdock, 528 N.W.2d 386 (S.D.1995), aff'd on reh, 544 N.W.2d 205 (S.D.1996).1 The Eighth Judicial Circuit ' Court, Lawrence County, granted the motion and confirmed and awarded the stock to defendant Case. Hickok’s, Inc. (Hickok’s) appeals. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] This appeal involves Hickok’s, a closely-held gaming corporation in Deadwood, South Dakota. There is a long history of conflict and litigation involving Hickok’s and its…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Case v. MurdockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. F.B.I. Farms, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Estate of Lien v. Pete Lien & Sons, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. McCroden v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McGroden v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API