McCroden v. Case
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, J.
[¶ 1.] Defendant Maxine Case (Case) made a motion to determine the status of a corporate stock purchase by her in light of our decision in Case v. Murdock, 528 N.W.2d 386 (S.D.1995), aff'd on reh, 544 N.W.2d 205 (S.D.1996).1 The Eighth Judicial Circuit ' Court, Lawrence County, granted the motion and confirmed and awarded the stock to defendant Case. Hickok’s, Inc. (Hickok’s) appeals. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] This appeal involves Hickok’s, a closely-held gaming corporation in Deadwood, South Dakota. There is a long history of conflict and litigation involving Hickok’s and its…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Case v. MurdockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- F.B.I. Farms, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of Lien v. Pete Lien & Sons, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- McCroden v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- McGroden v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999