Legal Opinion
Case v. Murdock
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1992No. 17558, 17581PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
PARTIES/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
For purposes of clarity and convenience, we shall refer to Maxine B. Case and Judith R. Sides, appellants, as Case and Sides; appellees’ advocacy shall hereinafter be referred to as the contentions of Hickok’s, Inc., and/or Hickok. Case and Sides brought suit claiming entitlement to stock shares in Hickok’s, Inc., also urging that various appellees were not entitled to stock shares. Hickok’s counterclaimed alleging breach of duty by Case and Sides.
A jury, having tried the issues, awarded punitive damages unto Hickok’s of $10,500 each from Case and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Flockhart v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Alberts v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Mobridge Community Industries, Inc. v. Toure, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Biegler v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.