People v. Freeman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB,
Defendant was convicted after trial by jury of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. This appeal is from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. There is also a purported appeal from the sentence.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to respondent, the essential facts are:
June 17, 1937, defendant took a female child of the age of six and one-half years into a garage and there committed an act prohibited by section 288 of the Penal Code.
Defendant relies for reversal of the judgment on the following propositions:
First: The evidence is insufficient to sustain the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. GrovesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. ArrangoizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. AvanziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. RomersaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. DentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. PikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.