Legal Opinion

People v. Avanzi

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1938No. Crim. 3071PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of violation of section 288a of the Penal Code after trial before the court without a jury defendant appeals. There is also a purported appeal from the sentence.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the People (respondent) the facts in the instant case are:

September 20, 1937, while in a state of voluntary intoxication, defendant committed an act prohibited by section 288a of the Penal Code upon a female eight years of age.

Defendant relies for reversal of the judgment on the following proposition:

Defendant was not guilty of the offense of which he was convicted,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BurkhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. ArrangoizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. HaskinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API