Randall v. Chubb
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Livingston. Proceedings under Comp. L. ch. 211 to recover possession of lands. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.
The evidence fully sustains the finding of facts in this case.
Chubb leased the premises in question to Ayers Stoddard for the term of three years, with the privilege of five, upon shares. Stoddard was to do all the work, find all the seed and to deliver to the lessor one-third the crops. The farm was to be cropped in a certain specified way, and the lessee was to have the use of certain farm implements of the lessor, *312and was to take good care of them and repair them at his own expense during the term of the lease. This lease and his rights thereunder the lessee afterwards undertook to assign…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Sweet Air Investment, Inc v. KenneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Walker v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Lewis v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Thomas v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re the Estate of SauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.