Legal Opinion

Hupp Farm Corp. v. Neef

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1940No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 41,076PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff, as vendor, filed its bill of complaint August 15, 1938, for specific performance of a land contract or foreclosure and deficiency judgment against defendants. A decree was entered in favor of plaintiff for tbe sum of $4,063.38. Defendants appeal.

The facts are as follows: On July 19,1926, plaintiff corporation, as vendor, entered into a land contract with defendants, as vendees, covering premises in Oakland county, the consideration for the sale being the sum of $3,840, $384 of which sum was paid upon the execution of the contract. Other terms and conditions of the contract were as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Catlin v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Maday v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. San Poil Consolidated Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Miner v. DickeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Curtiss v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Homer Ore Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sparling v. BertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. In Re Frank Kunik Farms, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  4. Wonder Products, Inc. v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Campbell v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API